Strategy
The two-year pause that rewired how I build
Jake McKeon
April 2026 · 9 min read
I didn't plan to take two years off. I just didn't rush into the next thing.
And that decision changed everything.
2yrs
Post-exit
18mo
Until committed to a project
6mo
To $2M+ collective run rate
What I actually did
After selling Coconut Bowls, I had time. No pressure to jump into the next business, and enough income from some light consulting to keep things ticking over. So I didn't rush.
My next brand, ARTSN, was already ready to go. The concept was locked, the products were in a warehouse. But they sat there, dormant, for about 12 months while I, to be honest, went deep into AI.
What I actually did during that time was go deep into health, biotech, and longevity. I built a private lab testing funnel. The idea was simple: in Australia, if you want a blood test, you go to a doctor, get a referral, give blood, and wait for the doctor to explain the results. A few companies have started letting people buy referrals online and get the results sent directly to themselves, which is going wild in the US but is still a 1-2% behaviour in Australia. I thought there was a real opportunity to capture it with better marketing, branding, and AI-driven software.
It worked. The funnel was profitable from a gross margin perspective, especially around testosterone testing. I built an audience of tens of thousands of email subscribers and over a million Instagram followers in the process.
Where it broke
The model relied on me being a middleman between customers and existing medical companies. In healthcare, that's a dangerous place to sit.
To do it properly, I would have needed to hire a medical professional, invest heavily in compliance, and build legal infrastructure. Compliance was non-negotiable, and without practitioner privilege as a non-medical person, I was exposed to real risk around fines and patient privacy if anything went wrong.
So I didn't push it further. The audience is still there. The data is still there. It's real optionality I can come back to. I proved the model worked, but I realised that at this stage of my life, I wasn't the best person to pursue it.
What I was actually doing without realising it
At the time, it felt like I was messing around.
Looking back, I was doing something much more valuable. I was learning how to build leverage.
Most people use AI like this
Ask a question, get an answer.
I started using it like this
Build workflows, chain tasks, automate outcomes.
That's the difference most people miss. Not just using AI tools, but connecting APIs, automating workflows, chaining tasks together into systems.
The biggest shift wasn't ChatGPT or Claude or Gemini. It was moving beyond the chat interface and into systems. That's when everything changed.
What I consumed during that time
I listened to the All In podcast and My First Million every week. I paid close attention to people like Greg Isenberg who post about emerging AI tools. I spent a lot of time on X, subscribed to the newsletters that were catching the frontier of what AI could do.
The habit that compressed months into weeks
Whenever I wanted to learn a new tool, whether that was Claude Code, Cowork, Open Claw or Manus agents, I'd invest real time watching other people use it before I tried myself. Not guessing. Watching real workflows, then applying them.
What I believed before that I no longer do
Old belief
To really scale, you need to hire people smarter than you.
New belief
To scale, you need systems that outperform people.
That's a completely different model. And we're in a golden era for one-person businesses to reach heights that used to require entire teams. There's serious talk of one-person billion-dollar businesses becoming reality within a few years, and I absolutely believe it's possible.
What would have sounded crazy to me in 2023
Two things.
You can run an entire business without a team.
You can build production-grade assets in hours, not weeks.
Web development is the clearest example. Something that used to take weeks of back-and-forth with developers, thousands of dollars in contractor fees, now takes me one to two hours working with an AI tool. And the output is better, because the brief is whatever I type, and I iterate in real time instead of waiting days for revisions.
Same with images. Same with video. Same with copy. The gap between idea and execution has collapsed.
How this changed how I build
Before
Now
No lag. No dependency on anyone else's schedule or availability.
The part most people don't talk about
I used to believe there was a real trade-off between ambition and life. If I wanted to build something big, I had to sacrifice time with family, hobbies, health, the stuff that actually matters.
I don't believe that anymore.
You can build something meaningful, make great money, and still be present. Not because the work is easier, it isn't, but because the leverage is higher, the friction is lower, and the control sits with you.
The ability to have it all is genuinely possible now, if you're in control. And the people in control are the self-employed, the entrepreneurs, the people creating things.
The part I'm cautious about
This isn't all upside, and I want to be honest about that.
The people most at risk aren't founders. They're employees. I've written a separate piece directly for them.
The split that's coming
AI-enabled workers
Multiply their output. Irreplaceable.
Everyone else
Ignore AI. Get replaced.
If you're an employee reading this, I'd really encourage you to spend some time exploring what AI can do for your current role. Not because your job is going away tomorrow, but because the gap between AI-enabled workers and everyone else is going to widen fast.
What triggered the “no employees” thesis
It wasn't a single moment. It was my operating rhythm.
I realised my current business can generate tens of thousands of dollars a day or a week, and my time isn't the constraint. Execution isn't the constraint.
The question changed
If time isn't the bottleneck, what is?
Judgment. What to build, what to test, what to prioritise, what to walk away from.
AI can execute. It still can't decide what matters. That's the job now.
Advice for anyone who just exited
Don't rush into the next thing. That pressure is real, and it's dangerous.
Picking the wrong path isn't neutral. It compounds in the wrong direction. You can lose years. And more importantly, you can miss the right opportunity entirely because you committed to the wrong one too quickly.
Instead, ask yourself
What do I actually want now?
What kind of business fits the life I've got?
What game is worth playing for the next five to ten years?
Because at this stage, you don't need another business. You need the right one. And the only way to find that is to give yourself enough space to figure out how the game has actually changed.
The bottom line
That two-year pause didn't slow me down. It compressed my next three to five years into six months. Because when I came back to building, I wasn't just building a business. I was building it with leverage most people don't have yet.
The biggest risk after an exit isn't doing nothing. It's committing too quickly to something that isn't worth your next decade. Choose a pursuit worthy of the next decade.
The best thing I did after selling Coconut Bowls wasn't starting something new. It was giving myself enough space to learn how the game had changed.